Duluth lawyer reacts to Supreme Court ruling on blood drive

DULUTH, MN — On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in saying officers can draw blood when a motorist, suspected of impaired driving is unconscious.

The question before the Supreme Court had to do with what happens when a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol is unconscious, generally as a result of a crash.

Wisconsin law said that in that case, blood can be drawn even without a warrant. Lawyers for the driver argued drawing blood was in violation of the Fourth Amendment because it prohibits against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Brent Olson a Criminal Defense and DWI lawyer, says he understands it is a compelling topic, but balance is needed.

“In exchange for your ability to operate on public roadways, implicitly you consent to having your blood-alcohol tested when you’re suspected of drinking and driving. The line that is always drawn is freedom and safety, and we kind of have to have a balance of those things all the time,” said Olson.

Olson says it was unusual for the Supreme Court to take up this case after ruling on a similar one three years ago in North Dakota, where they decided on warrant-less breath samples.

As for what’s next, going forward Olson says the Supreme Court ruling means one more piece of evidence to analyze during similar cases.

Emma Quinn

Emma Quinn

More News

Your Forecast Now

International Falls
Grand Marais
Storms end Monday night, calmer Tuesday ahead

Storms end Monday night, calmer Tuesday ahead

MONDAY NIGHT: A low and its fronts tangling with the heat of the day have created severe storms over much

Click for forecast details...
top stories
Scroll to top
Skip to content